Skip to content

5 new Authority Documents have been added to the UCF

The Center for Internet Security Docker Level 1 Docker Engine Enterprise Benchmark AD ID: 3229...

UCF
The Center for Internet Security Docker Level 1 Docker Engine Enterprise Benchmark
AD ID: 3229
Status: Released
Availability: With Membership
Citation Format: ID (Reference ID)
Document Type: The Center for Internet Security Docker Level 1 Docker Engine Enterprise Benchmark
Originator: The Center for Internet Security
Parent Category: International
Effective Date: 2019-07-29
Language: eng

Click here to launch this Authority Document in the Common Controls Hub

This Authority Document has 18 citations mapped to 6 UCF Common Control IDs. The document as a whole was last reviewed and released on 2020-10-27.

Percent (%) of Citations with multiple mandates: 0%

Percent (%) of terms that were non-standard: 100.00% The number of non-standard terms doesn't affect UCF users as the UCF team have already mapped those terms to standard terms in the Compliance Dictionary.

Percent (%) of terms mapped into the AD's glossary: 0% Primary verbs and nouns not mapped into an AD's glossary can point to the AD's authors not paying attention to the definitions of their terms.

Percent (%) of terms where fewer than 5 other ADs referenced the term: 27.8% Any term in this category is not very widely used by the rest of the compliance community and therefore will more than likely need to be further investigated for any implications it might bring.

Percent (%) of mandates where only 1 to 5 other ADs mapped to the Common Control: 0% Mandates that aren't widely called for will take longer to implement than mandates that are more familiar.

Number of mandates where 0 other ADs mapped to the Common Control: 0% These mandates are only called for by this AD, making them particularly thorny to implement, as this AD is the "lone wolf" in asking for them to be followed.



The Center for Internet Security Kubernetes Level 1 Worker Node Benchmark
AD ID: 3230
Status: Released
Availability: With Membership
Citation Format: ID (Reference ID)
Document Type: The Center for Internet Security Kubernetes Level 1 Worker Node Benchmark
Originator: The Center for Internet Security
Parent Category: International
Effective Date: 2020-07-23
Language: eng

Click here to launch this Authority Document in the Common Controls Hub

This Authority Document has 40 citations mapped to 22 UCF Common Control IDs. The document as a whole was last reviewed and released on 2020-10-27.

Percent (%) of Citations with multiple mandates: 2.6%

Percent (%) of terms that were non-standard: 100.00% The number of non-standard terms doesn't affect UCF users as the UCF team have already mapped those terms to standard terms in the Compliance Dictionary.

Percent (%) of terms mapped into the AD's glossary: 0% Primary verbs and nouns not mapped into an AD's glossary can point to the AD's authors not paying attention to the definitions of their terms.

Percent (%) of terms where fewer than 5 other ADs referenced the term: 60% Any term in this category is not very widely used by the rest of the compliance community and therefore will more than likely need to be further investigated for any implications it might bring.

Percent (%) of mandates where only 1 to 5 other ADs mapped to the Common Control: 0% Mandates that aren't widely called for will take longer to implement than mandates that are more familiar.

Number of mandates where 0 other ADs mapped to the Common Control: 0% These mandates are only called for by this AD, making them particularly thorny to implement, as this AD is the "lone wolf" in asking for them to be followed.



The Center for Internet Security Docker Level 1 Docker Linux Benchmark
AD ID: 3236
Status: Released
Availability: With Membership
Citation Format: ID (Reference ID)
Document Type: The Center for Internet Security Docker Level 1 Docker Linux Benchmark
Originator: The Center for Internet Security
Parent Category: International
Effective Date: 2019-07-29
Language: eng

Click here to launch this Authority Document in the Common Controls Hub

This Authority Document has 96 citations mapped to 76 UCF Common Control IDs. The document as a whole was last reviewed and released on 2020-10-27.

Percent (%) of Citations with multiple mandates: 6.7%

Percent (%) of terms that were non-standard: 100.00% The number of non-standard terms doesn't affect UCF users as the UCF team have already mapped those terms to standard terms in the Compliance Dictionary.

Percent (%) of terms mapped into the AD's glossary: 0% Primary verbs and nouns not mapped into an AD's glossary can point to the AD's authors not paying attention to the definitions of their terms.

Percent (%) of terms where fewer than 5 other ADs referenced the term: 81.3% Any term in this category is not very widely used by the rest of the compliance community and therefore will more than likely need to be further investigated for any implications it might bring.

Percent (%) of mandates where only 1 to 5 other ADs mapped to the Common Control: 0% Mandates that aren't widely called for will take longer to implement than mandates that are more familiar.

Number of mandates where 0 other ADs mapped to the Common Control: 0% These mandates are only called for by this AD, making them particularly thorny to implement, as this AD is the "lone wolf" in asking for them to be followed.



The Center for Internet Security Docker Level 1 Linus Host OS Benchmark
AD ID: 3237
Status: Released
Availability: With Membership
Citation Format: ID (Reference ID)
Document Type: The Center for Internet Security Docker Level 1 Linus Host OS Benchmark
Originator: The Center for Internet Security
Parent Category: International
Effective Date: 2019-07-29
Language: eng

Click here to launch this Authority Document in the Common Controls Hub

This Authority Document has 28 citations mapped to 16 UCF Common Control IDs. The document as a whole was last reviewed and released on 2020-10-27.

Percent (%) of Citations with multiple mandates: 3.7%

Percent (%) of terms that were non-standard: 100.00% The number of non-standard terms doesn't affect UCF users as the UCF team have already mapped those terms to standard terms in the Compliance Dictionary.

Percent (%) of terms mapped into the AD's glossary: 0% Primary verbs and nouns not mapped into an AD's glossary can point to the AD's authors not paying attention to the definitions of their terms.

Percent (%) of terms where fewer than 5 other ADs referenced the term: 46.4% Any term in this category is not very widely used by the rest of the compliance community and therefore will more than likely need to be further investigated for any implications it might bring.

Percent (%) of mandates where only 1 to 5 other ADs mapped to the Common Control: 0% Mandates that aren't widely called for will take longer to implement than mandates that are more familiar.

Number of mandates where 0 other ADs mapped to the Common Control: 0% These mandates are only called for by this AD, making them particularly thorny to implement, as this AD is the "lone wolf" in asking for them to be followed.



The Center for Internet Security Kubernetes Level 1 Master Node Benchmark
AD ID: 3238
Status: Released
Availability: With Membership
Citation Format: ID (Reference ID)
Document Type: The Center for Internet Security Kubernetes Level 1 Master Node Benchmark
Originator: The Center for Internet Security
Parent Category: International
Effective Date: 2020-07-23
Language: eng

Click here to launch this Authority Document in the Common Controls Hub

This Authority Document has 114 citations mapped to 86 UCF Common Control IDs. The document as a whole was last reviewed and released on 2020-10-27.

Percent (%) of Citations with multiple mandates: 6.7%

Percent (%) of terms that were non-standard: 100.00% The number of non-standard terms doesn't affect UCF users as the UCF team have already mapped those terms to standard terms in the Compliance Dictionary.

Percent (%) of terms mapped into the AD's glossary: 0% Primary verbs and nouns not mapped into an AD's glossary can point to the AD's authors not paying attention to the definitions of their terms.

Percent (%) of terms where fewer than 5 other ADs referenced the term: 82.5% Any term in this category is not very widely used by the rest of the compliance community and therefore will more than likely need to be further investigated for any implications it might bring.

Percent (%) of mandates where only 1 to 5 other ADs mapped to the Common Control: 0% Mandates that aren't widely called for will take longer to implement than mandates that are more familiar.

Number of mandates where 0 other ADs mapped to the Common Control: 0% These mandates are only called for by this AD, making them particularly thorny to implement, as this AD is the "lone wolf" in asking for them to be followed.