49 new Authority Documents have been added to the UCF
Security and Privacy Controls for Federal Information Systems and Organizations, NIST SP 800-53 AD...
Click here to launch this Authority Document in the Common Controls Hub
This Authority Document has 2123 citations mapped to 736 UCF Common Control IDs. The document as a whole was last reviewed and released on 2018-03-02.
Percent (%) of Citations with multiple mandates: 1%
Percent (%) of terms that were non-standard: 0.00% The number of non-standard terms doesn't affect UCF users as the UCF team have already mapped those terms to standard terms in the Compliance Dictionary.
Percent (%) of terms mapped into the AD's glossary: 0% Primary verbs and nouns not mapped into an AD's glossary can point to the AD's authors not paying attention to the definitions of their terms.
Percent (%) of terms where fewer than 5 other ADs referenced the term: 9.7% Any term in this category is not very widely used by the rest of the compliance community and therefore will more than likely need to be further investigated for any implications it might bring.
Percent (%) of mandates where only 1 to 5 other ADs mapped to the Common Control: 0% Mandates that aren't widely called for will take longer to implement than mandates that are more familiar.
Number of mandates where 0 other ADs mapped to the Common Control: 3.1% These mandates are only called for by this AD, making them particularly thorny to implement, as this AD is the "lone wolf" in asking for them to be followed.
Click here to launch this Authority Document in the Common Controls Hub
This Authority Document has 669 citations mapped to 252 UCF Common Control IDs. The document as a whole was last reviewed and released on 2018-03-02.
Percent (%) of Citations with multiple mandates: 1.4%
Percent (%) of terms that were non-standard: 0.00% The number of non-standard terms doesn't affect UCF users as the UCF team have already mapped those terms to standard terms in the Compliance Dictionary.
Percent (%) of terms mapped into the AD's glossary: 0% Primary verbs and nouns not mapped into an AD's glossary can point to the AD's authors not paying attention to the definitions of their terms.
Percent (%) of terms where fewer than 5 other ADs referenced the term: 4.9% Any term in this category is not very widely used by the rest of the compliance community and therefore will more than likely need to be further investigated for any implications it might bring.
Percent (%) of mandates where only 1 to 5 other ADs mapped to the Common Control: 0% Mandates that aren't widely called for will take longer to implement than mandates that are more familiar.
Number of mandates where 0 other ADs mapped to the Common Control: 0% These mandates are only called for by this AD, making them particularly thorny to implement, as this AD is the "lone wolf" in asking for them to be followed.
Click here to launch this Authority Document in the Common Controls Hub
This Authority Document has 883 citations mapped to 373 UCF Common Control IDs. The document as a whole was last reviewed and released on 2018-03-18.
Percent (%) of Citations with multiple mandates: 1.3%
Percent (%) of terms that were non-standard: 0.00% The number of non-standard terms doesn't affect UCF users as the UCF team have already mapped those terms to standard terms in the Compliance Dictionary.
Percent (%) of terms mapped into the AD's glossary: 0% Primary verbs and nouns not mapped into an AD's glossary can point to the AD's authors not paying attention to the definitions of their terms.
Percent (%) of terms where fewer than 5 other ADs referenced the term: 6.1% Any term in this category is not very widely used by the rest of the compliance community and therefore will more than likely need to be further investigated for any implications it might bring.
Percent (%) of mandates where only 1 to 5 other ADs mapped to the Common Control: 0% Mandates that aren't widely called for will take longer to implement than mandates that are more familiar.
Number of mandates where 0 other ADs mapped to the Common Control: 0% These mandates are only called for by this AD, making them particularly thorny to implement, as this AD is the "lone wolf" in asking for them to be followed.
Click here to launch this Authority Document in the Common Controls Hub
This Authority Document has 1057 citations mapped to 426 UCF Common Control IDs. The document as a whole was last reviewed and released on 2018-03-02.
Percent (%) of Citations with multiple mandates: 1.1%
Percent (%) of terms that were non-standard: 0.00% The number of non-standard terms doesn't affect UCF users as the UCF team have already mapped those terms to standard terms in the Compliance Dictionary.
Percent (%) of terms mapped into the AD's glossary: 0% Primary verbs and nouns not mapped into an AD's glossary can point to the AD's authors not paying attention to the definitions of their terms.
Percent (%) of terms where fewer than 5 other ADs referenced the term: 6.8% Any term in this category is not very widely used by the rest of the compliance community and therefore will more than likely need to be further investigated for any implications it might bring.
Percent (%) of mandates where only 1 to 5 other ADs mapped to the Common Control: 0% Mandates that aren't widely called for will take longer to implement than mandates that are more familiar.
Number of mandates where 0 other ADs mapped to the Common Control: 0% These mandates are only called for by this AD, making them particularly thorny to implement, as this AD is the "lone wolf" in asking for them to be followed.
Click here to launch this Authority Document in the Common Controls Hub
This Authority Document has 27 citations mapped to 18 UCF Common Control IDs. The document as a whole was last reviewed and released on 2017-12-04.
Percent (%) of Citations with multiple mandates: 15.8%
Percent (%) of terms that were non-standard: 0.00% The number of non-standard terms doesn't affect UCF users as the UCF team have already mapped those terms to standard terms in the Compliance Dictionary.
Percent (%) of terms mapped into the AD's glossary: 0% Primary verbs and nouns not mapped into an AD's glossary can point to the AD's authors not paying attention to the definitions of their terms.
Percent (%) of terms where fewer than 5 other ADs referenced the term: 0% Any term in this category is not very widely used by the rest of the compliance community and therefore will more than likely need to be further investigated for any implications it might bring.
Percent (%) of mandates where only 1 to 5 other ADs mapped to the Common Control: 0% Mandates that aren't widely called for will take longer to implement than mandates that are more familiar.
Number of mandates where 0 other ADs mapped to the Common Control: 0% These mandates are only called for by this AD, making them particularly thorny to implement, as this AD is the "lone wolf" in asking for them to be followed.
Click here to launch this Authority Document in the Common Controls Hub
This Authority Document has 35 citations mapped to 20 UCF Common Control IDs. The document as a whole was last reviewed and released on 2017-12-04.
Percent (%) of Citations with multiple mandates: 9.7%
Percent (%) of terms that were non-standard: 0.00% The number of non-standard terms doesn't affect UCF users as the UCF team have already mapped those terms to standard terms in the Compliance Dictionary.
Percent (%) of terms mapped into the AD's glossary: 0% Primary verbs and nouns not mapped into an AD's glossary can point to the AD's authors not paying attention to the definitions of their terms.
Percent (%) of terms where fewer than 5 other ADs referenced the term: 0% Any term in this category is not very widely used by the rest of the compliance community and therefore will more than likely need to be further investigated for any implications it might bring.
Percent (%) of mandates where only 1 to 5 other ADs mapped to the Common Control: 0% Mandates that aren't widely called for will take longer to implement than mandates that are more familiar.
Number of mandates where 0 other ADs mapped to the Common Control: 0% These mandates are only called for by this AD, making them particularly thorny to implement, as this AD is the "lone wolf" in asking for them to be followed.
Click here to launch this Authority Document in the Common Controls Hub
This Authority Document has 514 citations mapped to 336 UCF Common Control IDs. The document as a whole was last reviewed and released on 2017-10-20.
Percent (%) of Citations with multiple mandates: 32.6%
Percent (%) of terms that were non-standard: 0.00% The number of non-standard terms doesn't affect UCF users as the UCF team have already mapped those terms to standard terms in the Compliance Dictionary.
Percent (%) of terms mapped into the AD's glossary: 0.1% Primary verbs and nouns not mapped into an AD's glossary can point to the AD's authors not paying attention to the definitions of their terms.
Percent (%) of terms where fewer than 5 other ADs referenced the term: 17.1% Any term in this category is not very widely used by the rest of the compliance community and therefore will more than likely need to be further investigated for any implications it might bring.
Percent (%) of mandates where only 1 to 5 other ADs mapped to the Common Control: 0% Mandates that aren't widely called for will take longer to implement than mandates that are more familiar.
Number of mandates where 0 other ADs mapped to the Common Control: 9.5% These mandates are only called for by this AD, making them particularly thorny to implement, as this AD is the "lone wolf" in asking for them to be followed.
Click here to launch this Authority Document in the Common Controls Hub
This Authority Document has 670 citations mapped to 255 UCF Common Control IDs. The document as a whole was last reviewed and released on 2018-03-08.
Percent (%) of Citations with multiple mandates: 20.6%
Percent (%) of terms that were non-standard: 0.00% The number of non-standard terms doesn't affect UCF users as the UCF team have already mapped those terms to standard terms in the Compliance Dictionary.
Percent (%) of terms mapped into the AD's glossary: 0.3% Primary verbs and nouns not mapped into an AD's glossary can point to the AD's authors not paying attention to the definitions of their terms.
Percent (%) of terms where fewer than 5 other ADs referenced the term: 29.4% Any term in this category is not very widely used by the rest of the compliance community and therefore will more than likely need to be further investigated for any implications it might bring.
Percent (%) of mandates where only 1 to 5 other ADs mapped to the Common Control: 100% Mandates that aren't widely called for will take longer to implement than mandates that are more familiar.
Number of mandates where 0 other ADs mapped to the Common Control: 4.8% These mandates are only called for by this AD, making them particularly thorny to implement, as this AD is the "lone wolf" in asking for them to be followed.
Click here to launch this Authority Document in the Common Controls Hub
This Authority Document has 313 citations mapped to 231 UCF Common Control IDs. The document as a whole was last reviewed and released on 2017-11-07.
Percent (%) of Citations with multiple mandates: 55.3%
Percent (%) of terms that were non-standard: 0.00% The number of non-standard terms doesn't affect UCF users as the UCF team have already mapped those terms to standard terms in the Compliance Dictionary.
Percent (%) of terms mapped into the AD's glossary: 0.8% Primary verbs and nouns not mapped into an AD's glossary can point to the AD's authors not paying attention to the definitions of their terms.
Percent (%) of terms where fewer than 5 other ADs referenced the term: 18.2% Any term in this category is not very widely used by the rest of the compliance community and therefore will more than likely need to be further investigated for any implications it might bring.
Percent (%) of mandates where only 1 to 5 other ADs mapped to the Common Control: 100% Mandates that aren't widely called for will take longer to implement than mandates that are more familiar.
Number of mandates where 0 other ADs mapped to the Common Control: 8.3% These mandates are only called for by this AD, making them particularly thorny to implement, as this AD is the "lone wolf" in asking for them to be followed.
Click here to launch this Authority Document in the Common Controls Hub
This Authority Document has 134 citations mapped to 84 UCF Common Control IDs. The document as a whole was last reviewed and released on 2018-03-23.
Percent (%) of Citations with multiple mandates: 32.9%
Percent (%) of terms that were non-standard: 0.00% The number of non-standard terms doesn't affect UCF users as the UCF team have already mapped those terms to standard terms in the Compliance Dictionary.
Percent (%) of terms mapped into the AD's glossary: 31.5% Primary verbs and nouns not mapped into an AD's glossary can point to the AD's authors not paying attention to the definitions of their terms.
Percent (%) of terms where fewer than 5 other ADs referenced the term: 9.7% Any term in this category is not very widely used by the rest of the compliance community and therefore will more than likely need to be further investigated for any implications it might bring.
Percent (%) of mandates where only 1 to 5 other ADs mapped to the Common Control: 52.9% Mandates that aren't widely called for will take longer to implement than mandates that are more familiar.
Number of mandates where 0 other ADs mapped to the Common Control: 64.9% These mandates are only called for by this AD, making them particularly thorny to implement, as this AD is the "lone wolf" in asking for them to be followed.
Click here to launch this Authority Document in the Common Controls Hub
This Authority Document has 643 citations mapped to 138 UCF Common Control IDs. The document as a whole was last reviewed and released on 2017-11-17.
Percent (%) of Citations with multiple mandates: 10%
Percent (%) of terms that were non-standard: 0.00% The number of non-standard terms doesn't affect UCF users as the UCF team have already mapped those terms to standard terms in the Compliance Dictionary.
Percent (%) of terms mapped into the AD's glossary: 0.4% Primary verbs and nouns not mapped into an AD's glossary can point to the AD's authors not paying attention to the definitions of their terms.
Percent (%) of terms where fewer than 5 other ADs referenced the term: 7.9% Any term in this category is not very widely used by the rest of the compliance community and therefore will more than likely need to be further investigated for any implications it might bring.
Percent (%) of mandates where only 1 to 5 other ADs mapped to the Common Control: 0% Mandates that aren't widely called for will take longer to implement than mandates that are more familiar.
Number of mandates where 0 other ADs mapped to the Common Control: 4.4% These mandates are only called for by this AD, making them particularly thorny to implement, as this AD is the "lone wolf" in asking for them to be followed.
Click here to launch this Authority Document in the Common Controls Hub
This Authority Document has 631 citations mapped to 255 UCF Common Control IDs. The document as a whole was last reviewed and released on 2018-01-23.
Percent (%) of Citations with multiple mandates: 32.8%
Percent (%) of terms that were non-standard: 0.00% The number of non-standard terms doesn't affect UCF users as the UCF team have already mapped those terms to standard terms in the Compliance Dictionary.
Percent (%) of terms mapped into the AD's glossary: 11.2% Primary verbs and nouns not mapped into an AD's glossary can point to the AD's authors not paying attention to the definitions of their terms.
Percent (%) of terms where fewer than 5 other ADs referenced the term: 27.1% Any term in this category is not very widely used by the rest of the compliance community and therefore will more than likely need to be further investigated for any implications it might bring.
Percent (%) of mandates where only 1 to 5 other ADs mapped to the Common Control: 34.5% Mandates that aren't widely called for will take longer to implement than mandates that are more familiar.
Number of mandates where 0 other ADs mapped to the Common Control: 13.6% These mandates are only called for by this AD, making them particularly thorny to implement, as this AD is the "lone wolf" in asking for them to be followed.
Click here to launch this Authority Document in the Common Controls Hub
This Authority Document has 659 citations mapped to 317 UCF Common Control IDs. The document as a whole was last reviewed and released on 2017-12-07.
Percent (%) of Citations with multiple mandates: 35.8%
Percent (%) of terms that were non-standard: 0.00% The number of non-standard terms doesn't affect UCF users as the UCF team have already mapped those terms to standard terms in the Compliance Dictionary.
Percent (%) of terms mapped into the AD's glossary: 8.8% Primary verbs and nouns not mapped into an AD's glossary can point to the AD's authors not paying attention to the definitions of their terms.
Percent (%) of terms where fewer than 5 other ADs referenced the term: 27.3% Any term in this category is not very widely used by the rest of the compliance community and therefore will more than likely need to be further investigated for any implications it might bring.
Percent (%) of mandates where only 1 to 5 other ADs mapped to the Common Control: 31.3% Mandates that aren't widely called for will take longer to implement than mandates that are more familiar.
Number of mandates where 0 other ADs mapped to the Common Control: 2% These mandates are only called for by this AD, making them particularly thorny to implement, as this AD is the "lone wolf" in asking for them to be followed.
Click here to launch this Authority Document in the Common Controls Hub
This Authority Document has 335 citations mapped to 190 UCF Common Control IDs. The document as a whole was last reviewed and released on 2017-11-22.
Percent (%) of Citations with multiple mandates: 25.1%
Percent (%) of terms that were non-standard: 0.00% The number of non-standard terms doesn't affect UCF users as the UCF team have already mapped those terms to standard terms in the Compliance Dictionary.
Percent (%) of terms mapped into the AD's glossary: 0.8% Primary verbs and nouns not mapped into an AD's glossary can point to the AD's authors not paying attention to the definitions of their terms.
Percent (%) of terms where fewer than 5 other ADs referenced the term: 24.2% Any term in this category is not very widely used by the rest of the compliance community and therefore will more than likely need to be further investigated for any implications it might bring.
Percent (%) of mandates where only 1 to 5 other ADs mapped to the Common Control: 75% Mandates that aren't widely called for will take longer to implement than mandates that are more familiar.
Number of mandates where 0 other ADs mapped to the Common Control: 0.9% These mandates are only called for by this AD, making them particularly thorny to implement, as this AD is the "lone wolf" in asking for them to be followed.
Click here to launch this Authority Document in the Common Controls Hub
This Authority Document has 33 citations mapped to 23 UCF Common Control IDs. The document as a whole was last reviewed and released on 2017-10-03.
Percent (%) of Citations with multiple mandates: 14.3%
Percent (%) of terms that were non-standard: 0.00% The number of non-standard terms doesn't affect UCF users as the UCF team have already mapped those terms to standard terms in the Compliance Dictionary.
Percent (%) of terms mapped into the AD's glossary: 0% Primary verbs and nouns not mapped into an AD's glossary can point to the AD's authors not paying attention to the definitions of their terms.
Percent (%) of terms where fewer than 5 other ADs referenced the term: 0% Any term in this category is not very widely used by the rest of the compliance community and therefore will more than likely need to be further investigated for any implications it might bring.
Percent (%) of mandates where only 1 to 5 other ADs mapped to the Common Control: 0% Mandates that aren't widely called for will take longer to implement than mandates that are more familiar.
Number of mandates where 0 other ADs mapped to the Common Control: 3% These mandates are only called for by this AD, making them particularly thorny to implement, as this AD is the "lone wolf" in asking for them to be followed.
Click here to launch this Authority Document in the Common Controls Hub
This Authority Document has 84 citations mapped to 43 UCF Common Control IDs. The document as a whole was last reviewed and released on 2017-10-03.
Percent (%) of Citations with multiple mandates: 14.7%
Percent (%) of terms that were non-standard: 0.00% The number of non-standard terms doesn't affect UCF users as the UCF team have already mapped those terms to standard terms in the Compliance Dictionary.
Percent (%) of terms mapped into the AD's glossary: 0% Primary verbs and nouns not mapped into an AD's glossary can point to the AD's authors not paying attention to the definitions of their terms.
Percent (%) of terms where fewer than 5 other ADs referenced the term: 17.9% Any term in this category is not very widely used by the rest of the compliance community and therefore will more than likely need to be further investigated for any implications it might bring.
Percent (%) of mandates where only 1 to 5 other ADs mapped to the Common Control: 0% Mandates that aren't widely called for will take longer to implement than mandates that are more familiar.
Number of mandates where 0 other ADs mapped to the Common Control: 1.2% These mandates are only called for by this AD, making them particularly thorny to implement, as this AD is the "lone wolf" in asking for them to be followed.
Click here to launch this Authority Document in the Common Controls Hub
This Authority Document has 39 citations mapped to 25 UCF Common Control IDs. The document as a whole was last reviewed and released on 2017-10-17.
Percent (%) of Citations with multiple mandates: 9.1%
Percent (%) of terms that were non-standard: 0.00% The number of non-standard terms doesn't affect UCF users as the UCF team have already mapped those terms to standard terms in the Compliance Dictionary.
Percent (%) of terms mapped into the AD's glossary: 0% Primary verbs and nouns not mapped into an AD's glossary can point to the AD's authors not paying attention to the definitions of their terms.
Percent (%) of terms where fewer than 5 other ADs referenced the term: 10.3% Any term in this category is not very widely used by the rest of the compliance community and therefore will more than likely need to be further investigated for any implications it might bring.
Percent (%) of mandates where only 1 to 5 other ADs mapped to the Common Control: 0% Mandates that aren't widely called for will take longer to implement than mandates that are more familiar.
Number of mandates where 0 other ADs mapped to the Common Control: 0% These mandates are only called for by this AD, making them particularly thorny to implement, as this AD is the "lone wolf" in asking for them to be followed.
Click here to launch this Authority Document in the Common Controls Hub
This Authority Document has 6 citations mapped to 4 UCF Common Control IDs. The document as a whole was last reviewed and released on 2017-10-16.
Percent (%) of Citations with multiple mandates: 20%
Percent (%) of terms that were non-standard: 0.00% The number of non-standard terms doesn't affect UCF users as the UCF team have already mapped those terms to standard terms in the Compliance Dictionary.
Percent (%) of terms mapped into the AD's glossary: 0% Primary verbs and nouns not mapped into an AD's glossary can point to the AD's authors not paying attention to the definitions of their terms.
Percent (%) of terms where fewer than 5 other ADs referenced the term: 0% Any term in this category is not very widely used by the rest of the compliance community and therefore will more than likely need to be further investigated for any implications it might bring.
Percent (%) of mandates where only 1 to 5 other ADs mapped to the Common Control: 0% Mandates that aren't widely called for will take longer to implement than mandates that are more familiar.
Number of mandates where 0 other ADs mapped to the Common Control: 0% These mandates are only called for by this AD, making them particularly thorny to implement, as this AD is the "lone wolf" in asking for them to be followed.
Click here to launch this Authority Document in the Common Controls Hub
This Authority Document has 59 citations mapped to 46 UCF Common Control IDs. The document as a whole was last reviewed and released on 2017-10-16.
Percent (%) of Citations with multiple mandates: 31.3%
Percent (%) of terms that were non-standard: 0.00% The number of non-standard terms doesn't affect UCF users as the UCF team have already mapped those terms to standard terms in the Compliance Dictionary.
Percent (%) of terms mapped into the AD's glossary: 0% Primary verbs and nouns not mapped into an AD's glossary can point to the AD's authors not paying attention to the definitions of their terms.
Percent (%) of terms where fewer than 5 other ADs referenced the term: 15.3% Any term in this category is not very widely used by the rest of the compliance community and therefore will more than likely need to be further investigated for any implications it might bring.
Percent (%) of mandates where only 1 to 5 other ADs mapped to the Common Control: 0% Mandates that aren't widely called for will take longer to implement than mandates that are more familiar.
Number of mandates where 0 other ADs mapped to the Common Control: 0% These mandates are only called for by this AD, making them particularly thorny to implement, as this AD is the "lone wolf" in asking for them to be followed.
Click here to launch this Authority Document in the Common Controls Hub
This Authority Document has 52 citations mapped to 35 UCF Common Control IDs. The document as a whole was last reviewed and released on 2017-10-19.
Percent (%) of Citations with multiple mandates: 4.2%
Percent (%) of terms that were non-standard: 0.00% The number of non-standard terms doesn't affect UCF users as the UCF team have already mapped those terms to standard terms in the Compliance Dictionary.
Percent (%) of terms mapped into the AD's glossary: 0% Primary verbs and nouns not mapped into an AD's glossary can point to the AD's authors not paying attention to the definitions of their terms.
Percent (%) of terms where fewer than 5 other ADs referenced the term: 3.8% Any term in this category is not very widely used by the rest of the compliance community and therefore will more than likely need to be further investigated for any implications it might bring.
Percent (%) of mandates where only 1 to 5 other ADs mapped to the Common Control: 0% Mandates that aren't widely called for will take longer to implement than mandates that are more familiar.
Number of mandates where 0 other ADs mapped to the Common Control: 0% These mandates are only called for by this AD, making them particularly thorny to implement, as this AD is the "lone wolf" in asking for them to be followed.
Click here to launch this Authority Document in the Common Controls Hub
This Authority Document has 62 citations mapped to 25 UCF Common Control IDs. The document as a whole was last reviewed and released on 2017-10-19.
Percent (%) of Citations with multiple mandates: 3.4%
Percent (%) of terms that were non-standard: 0.00% The number of non-standard terms doesn't affect UCF users as the UCF team have already mapped those terms to standard terms in the Compliance Dictionary.
Percent (%) of terms mapped into the AD's glossary: 0% Primary verbs and nouns not mapped into an AD's glossary can point to the AD's authors not paying attention to the definitions of their terms.
Percent (%) of terms where fewer than 5 other ADs referenced the term: 0% Any term in this category is not very widely used by the rest of the compliance community and therefore will more than likely need to be further investigated for any implications it might bring.
Percent (%) of mandates where only 1 to 5 other ADs mapped to the Common Control: 0% Mandates that aren't widely called for will take longer to implement than mandates that are more familiar.
Number of mandates where 0 other ADs mapped to the Common Control: 0% These mandates are only called for by this AD, making them particularly thorny to implement, as this AD is the "lone wolf" in asking for them to be followed.
Click here to launch this Authority Document in the Common Controls Hub
This Authority Document has 32 citations mapped to 28 UCF Common Control IDs. The document as a whole was last reviewed and released on 2017-10-19.
Percent (%) of Citations with multiple mandates: 20%
Percent (%) of terms that were non-standard: 0.00% The number of non-standard terms doesn't affect UCF users as the UCF team have already mapped those terms to standard terms in the Compliance Dictionary.
Percent (%) of terms mapped into the AD's glossary: 0% Primary verbs and nouns not mapped into an AD's glossary can point to the AD's authors not paying attention to the definitions of their terms.
Percent (%) of terms where fewer than 5 other ADs referenced the term: 18.8% Any term in this category is not very widely used by the rest of the compliance community and therefore will more than likely need to be further investigated for any implications it might bring.
Percent (%) of mandates where only 1 to 5 other ADs mapped to the Common Control: 0% Mandates that aren't widely called for will take longer to implement than mandates that are more familiar.
Number of mandates where 0 other ADs mapped to the Common Control: 0% These mandates are only called for by this AD, making them particularly thorny to implement, as this AD is the "lone wolf" in asking for them to be followed.
Click here to launch this Authority Document in the Common Controls Hub
This Authority Document has 38 citations mapped to 24 UCF Common Control IDs. The document as a whole was last reviewed and released on 2017-10-19.
Percent (%) of Citations with multiple mandates: 12.1%
Percent (%) of terms that were non-standard: 0.00% The number of non-standard terms doesn't affect UCF users as the UCF team have already mapped those terms to standard terms in the Compliance Dictionary.
Percent (%) of terms mapped into the AD's glossary: 0% Primary verbs and nouns not mapped into an AD's glossary can point to the AD's authors not paying attention to the definitions of their terms.
Percent (%) of terms where fewer than 5 other ADs referenced the term: 7.9% Any term in this category is not very widely used by the rest of the compliance community and therefore will more than likely need to be further investigated for any implications it might bring.
Percent (%) of mandates where only 1 to 5 other ADs mapped to the Common Control: 0% Mandates that aren't widely called for will take longer to implement than mandates that are more familiar.
Number of mandates where 0 other ADs mapped to the Common Control: 0% These mandates are only called for by this AD, making them particularly thorny to implement, as this AD is the "lone wolf" in asking for them to be followed.
Click here to launch this Authority Document in the Common Controls Hub
This Authority Document has 10 citations mapped to 3 UCF Common Control IDs. The document as a whole was last reviewed and released on 2017-10-19.
Percent (%) of Citations with multiple mandates: 0%
Percent (%) of terms that were non-standard: 0.00% The number of non-standard terms doesn't affect UCF users as the UCF team have already mapped those terms to standard terms in the Compliance Dictionary.
Percent (%) of terms mapped into the AD's glossary: 0% Primary verbs and nouns not mapped into an AD's glossary can point to the AD's authors not paying attention to the definitions of their terms.
Percent (%) of terms where fewer than 5 other ADs referenced the term: 0% Any term in this category is not very widely used by the rest of the compliance community and therefore will more than likely need to be further investigated for any implications it might bring.
Percent (%) of mandates where only 1 to 5 other ADs mapped to the Common Control: 0% Mandates that aren't widely called for will take longer to implement than mandates that are more familiar.
Number of mandates where 0 other ADs mapped to the Common Control: 0% These mandates are only called for by this AD, making them particularly thorny to implement, as this AD is the "lone wolf" in asking for them to be followed.
Click here to launch this Authority Document in the Common Controls Hub
This Authority Document has 11 citations mapped to 2 UCF Common Control IDs. The document as a whole was last reviewed and released on 2017-10-19.
Percent (%) of Citations with multiple mandates: 0%
Percent (%) of terms that were non-standard: 0.00% The number of non-standard terms doesn't affect UCF users as the UCF team have already mapped those terms to standard terms in the Compliance Dictionary.
Percent (%) of terms mapped into the AD's glossary: 0% Primary verbs and nouns not mapped into an AD's glossary can point to the AD's authors not paying attention to the definitions of their terms.
Percent (%) of terms where fewer than 5 other ADs referenced the term: 0% Any term in this category is not very widely used by the rest of the compliance community and therefore will more than likely need to be further investigated for any implications it might bring.
Percent (%) of mandates where only 1 to 5 other ADs mapped to the Common Control: 0% Mandates that aren't widely called for will take longer to implement than mandates that are more familiar.
Number of mandates where 0 other ADs mapped to the Common Control: 0% These mandates are only called for by this AD, making them particularly thorny to implement, as this AD is the "lone wolf" in asking for them to be followed.
Click here to launch this Authority Document in the Common Controls Hub
This Authority Document has 17 citations mapped to 3 UCF Common Control IDs. The document as a whole was last reviewed and released on 2017-10-19.
Percent (%) of Citations with multiple mandates: 0%
Percent (%) of terms that were non-standard: 0.00% The number of non-standard terms doesn't affect UCF users as the UCF team have already mapped those terms to standard terms in the Compliance Dictionary.
Percent (%) of terms mapped into the AD's glossary: 0% Primary verbs and nouns not mapped into an AD's glossary can point to the AD's authors not paying attention to the definitions of their terms.
Percent (%) of terms where fewer than 5 other ADs referenced the term: 0% Any term in this category is not very widely used by the rest of the compliance community and therefore will more than likely need to be further investigated for any implications it might bring.
Percent (%) of mandates where only 1 to 5 other ADs mapped to the Common Control: 0% Mandates that aren't widely called for will take longer to implement than mandates that are more familiar.
Number of mandates where 0 other ADs mapped to the Common Control: 0% These mandates are only called for by this AD, making them particularly thorny to implement, as this AD is the "lone wolf" in asking for them to be followed.
Click here to launch this Authority Document in the Common Controls Hub
This Authority Document has 67 citations mapped to 44 UCF Common Control IDs. The document as a whole was last reviewed and released on 2017-10-20.
Percent (%) of Citations with multiple mandates: 33.3%
Percent (%) of terms that were non-standard: 0.00% The number of non-standard terms doesn't affect UCF users as the UCF team have already mapped those terms to standard terms in the Compliance Dictionary.
Percent (%) of terms mapped into the AD's glossary: 0% Primary verbs and nouns not mapped into an AD's glossary can point to the AD's authors not paying attention to the definitions of their terms.
Percent (%) of terms where fewer than 5 other ADs referenced the term: 7.5% Any term in this category is not very widely used by the rest of the compliance community and therefore will more than likely need to be further investigated for any implications it might bring.
Percent (%) of mandates where only 1 to 5 other ADs mapped to the Common Control: 0% Mandates that aren't widely called for will take longer to implement than mandates that are more familiar.
Number of mandates where 0 other ADs mapped to the Common Control: 6% These mandates are only called for by this AD, making them particularly thorny to implement, as this AD is the "lone wolf" in asking for them to be followed.
Click here to launch this Authority Document in the Common Controls Hub
This Authority Document has 19 citations mapped to 14 UCF Common Control IDs. The document as a whole was last reviewed and released on 2017-10-16.
Percent (%) of Citations with multiple mandates: 20%
Percent (%) of terms that were non-standard: 0.00% The number of non-standard terms doesn't affect UCF users as the UCF team have already mapped those terms to standard terms in the Compliance Dictionary.
Percent (%) of terms mapped into the AD's glossary: 0% Primary verbs and nouns not mapped into an AD's glossary can point to the AD's authors not paying attention to the definitions of their terms.
Percent (%) of terms where fewer than 5 other ADs referenced the term: 5.3% Any term in this category is not very widely used by the rest of the compliance community and therefore will more than likely need to be further investigated for any implications it might bring.
Percent (%) of mandates where only 1 to 5 other ADs mapped to the Common Control: 0% Mandates that aren't widely called for will take longer to implement than mandates that are more familiar.
Number of mandates where 0 other ADs mapped to the Common Control: 0% These mandates are only called for by this AD, making them particularly thorny to implement, as this AD is the "lone wolf" in asking for them to be followed.
Click here to launch this Authority Document in the Common Controls Hub
This Authority Document has 130 citations mapped to 96 UCF Common Control IDs. The document as a whole was last reviewed and released on 2017-10-18.
Percent (%) of Citations with multiple mandates: 38.2%
Percent (%) of terms that were non-standard: 0.00% The number of non-standard terms doesn't affect UCF users as the UCF team have already mapped those terms to standard terms in the Compliance Dictionary.
Percent (%) of terms mapped into the AD's glossary: 1.4% Primary verbs and nouns not mapped into an AD's glossary can point to the AD's authors not paying attention to the definitions of their terms.
Percent (%) of terms where fewer than 5 other ADs referenced the term: 33.1% Any term in this category is not very widely used by the rest of the compliance community and therefore will more than likely need to be further investigated for any implications it might bring.
Percent (%) of mandates where only 1 to 5 other ADs mapped to the Common Control: 66.7% Mandates that aren't widely called for will take longer to implement than mandates that are more familiar.
Number of mandates where 0 other ADs mapped to the Common Control: 1.5% These mandates are only called for by this AD, making them particularly thorny to implement, as this AD is the "lone wolf" in asking for them to be followed.
Click here to launch this Authority Document in the Common Controls Hub
This Authority Document has 189 citations mapped to 151 UCF Common Control IDs. The document as a whole was last reviewed and released on 2017-12-18.
Percent (%) of Citations with multiple mandates: 22.4%
Percent (%) of terms that were non-standard: 0.00% The number of non-standard terms doesn't affect UCF users as the UCF team have already mapped those terms to standard terms in the Compliance Dictionary.
Percent (%) of terms mapped into the AD's glossary: 0% Primary verbs and nouns not mapped into an AD's glossary can point to the AD's authors not paying attention to the definitions of their terms.
Percent (%) of terms where fewer than 5 other ADs referenced the term: 23.3% Any term in this category is not very widely used by the rest of the compliance community and therefore will more than likely need to be further investigated for any implications it might bring.
Percent (%) of mandates where only 1 to 5 other ADs mapped to the Common Control: 0% Mandates that aren't widely called for will take longer to implement than mandates that are more familiar.
Number of mandates where 0 other ADs mapped to the Common Control: 1.6% These mandates are only called for by this AD, making them particularly thorny to implement, as this AD is the "lone wolf" in asking for them to be followed.
Click here to launch this Authority Document in the Common Controls Hub
This Authority Document has 693 citations mapped to 334 UCF Common Control IDs. The document as a whole was last reviewed and released on 2018-02-01.
Percent (%) of Citations with multiple mandates: 45.9%
Percent (%) of terms that were non-standard: 0.00% The number of non-standard terms doesn't affect UCF users as the UCF team have already mapped those terms to standard terms in the Compliance Dictionary.
Percent (%) of terms mapped into the AD's glossary: 0% Primary verbs and nouns not mapped into an AD's glossary can point to the AD's authors not paying attention to the definitions of their terms.
Percent (%) of terms where fewer than 5 other ADs referenced the term: 28% Any term in this category is not very widely used by the rest of the compliance community and therefore will more than likely need to be further investigated for any implications it might bring.
Percent (%) of mandates where only 1 to 5 other ADs mapped to the Common Control: 0% Mandates that aren't widely called for will take longer to implement than mandates that are more familiar.
Number of mandates where 0 other ADs mapped to the Common Control: 2.3% These mandates are only called for by this AD, making them particularly thorny to implement, as this AD is the "lone wolf" in asking for them to be followed.
Click here to launch this Authority Document in the Common Controls Hub
This Authority Document has 176 citations mapped to 133 UCF Common Control IDs. The document as a whole was last reviewed and released on 2018-01-12.
Percent (%) of Citations with multiple mandates: 22.8%
Percent (%) of terms that were non-standard: 0.00% The number of non-standard terms doesn't affect UCF users as the UCF team have already mapped those terms to standard terms in the Compliance Dictionary.
Percent (%) of terms mapped into the AD's glossary: 7.1% Primary verbs and nouns not mapped into an AD's glossary can point to the AD's authors not paying attention to the definitions of their terms.
Percent (%) of terms where fewer than 5 other ADs referenced the term: 15.3% Any term in this category is not very widely used by the rest of the compliance community and therefore will more than likely need to be further investigated for any implications it might bring.
Percent (%) of mandates where only 1 to 5 other ADs mapped to the Common Control: 10.5% Mandates that aren't widely called for will take longer to implement than mandates that are more familiar.
Number of mandates where 0 other ADs mapped to the Common Control: 13.6% These mandates are only called for by this AD, making them particularly thorny to implement, as this AD is the "lone wolf" in asking for them to be followed.
Click here to launch this Authority Document in the Common Controls Hub
This Authority Document has 134 citations mapped to 89 UCF Common Control IDs. The document as a whole was last reviewed and released on 2018-01-08.
Percent (%) of Citations with multiple mandates: 0%
Percent (%) of terms that were non-standard: 0.00% The number of non-standard terms doesn't affect UCF users as the UCF team have already mapped those terms to standard terms in the Compliance Dictionary.
Percent (%) of terms mapped into the AD's glossary: 0% Primary verbs and nouns not mapped into an AD's glossary can point to the AD's authors not paying attention to the definitions of their terms.
Percent (%) of terms where fewer than 5 other ADs referenced the term: 91% Any term in this category is not very widely used by the rest of the compliance community and therefore will more than likely need to be further investigated for any implications it might bring.
Percent (%) of mandates where only 1 to 5 other ADs mapped to the Common Control: 0% Mandates that aren't widely called for will take longer to implement than mandates that are more familiar.
Number of mandates where 0 other ADs mapped to the Common Control: 0% These mandates are only called for by this AD, making them particularly thorny to implement, as this AD is the "lone wolf" in asking for them to be followed.
Click here to launch this Authority Document in the Common Controls Hub
This Authority Document has 64 citations mapped to 35 UCF Common Control IDs. The document as a whole was last reviewed and released on 2018-02-13.
Percent (%) of Citations with multiple mandates: 11.3%
Percent (%) of terms that were non-standard: 0.00% The number of non-standard terms doesn't affect UCF users as the UCF team have already mapped those terms to standard terms in the Compliance Dictionary.
Percent (%) of terms mapped into the AD's glossary: 0% Primary verbs and nouns not mapped into an AD's glossary can point to the AD's authors not paying attention to the definitions of their terms.
Percent (%) of terms where fewer than 5 other ADs referenced the term: 10.9% Any term in this category is not very widely used by the rest of the compliance community and therefore will more than likely need to be further investigated for any implications it might bring.
Percent (%) of mandates where only 1 to 5 other ADs mapped to the Common Control: 0% Mandates that aren't widely called for will take longer to implement than mandates that are more familiar.
Number of mandates where 0 other ADs mapped to the Common Control: 3.1% These mandates are only called for by this AD, making them particularly thorny to implement, as this AD is the "lone wolf" in asking for them to be followed.
Click here to launch this Authority Document in the Common Controls Hub
This Authority Document has 67 citations mapped to 34 UCF Common Control IDs. The document as a whole was last reviewed and released on 2018-02-07.
Percent (%) of Citations with multiple mandates: 18.5%
Percent (%) of terms that were non-standard: 0.00% The number of non-standard terms doesn't affect UCF users as the UCF team have already mapped those terms to standard terms in the Compliance Dictionary.
Percent (%) of terms mapped into the AD's glossary: 0% Primary verbs and nouns not mapped into an AD's glossary can point to the AD's authors not paying attention to the definitions of their terms.
Percent (%) of terms where fewer than 5 other ADs referenced the term: 16.4% Any term in this category is not very widely used by the rest of the compliance community and therefore will more than likely need to be further investigated for any implications it might bring.
Percent (%) of mandates where only 1 to 5 other ADs mapped to the Common Control: 0% Mandates that aren't widely called for will take longer to implement than mandates that are more familiar.
Number of mandates where 0 other ADs mapped to the Common Control: 6% These mandates are only called for by this AD, making them particularly thorny to implement, as this AD is the "lone wolf" in asking for them to be followed.
Click here to launch this Authority Document in the Common Controls Hub
This Authority Document has 53 citations mapped to 30 UCF Common Control IDs. The document as a whole was last reviewed and released on 2018-02-12.
Percent (%) of Citations with multiple mandates: 23.7%
Percent (%) of terms that were non-standard: 0.00% The number of non-standard terms doesn't affect UCF users as the UCF team have already mapped those terms to standard terms in the Compliance Dictionary.
Percent (%) of terms mapped into the AD's glossary: 0% Primary verbs and nouns not mapped into an AD's glossary can point to the AD's authors not paying attention to the definitions of their terms.
Percent (%) of terms where fewer than 5 other ADs referenced the term: 18.9% Any term in this category is not very widely used by the rest of the compliance community and therefore will more than likely need to be further investigated for any implications it might bring.
Percent (%) of mandates where only 1 to 5 other ADs mapped to the Common Control: 0% Mandates that aren't widely called for will take longer to implement than mandates that are more familiar.
Number of mandates where 0 other ADs mapped to the Common Control: 20.8% These mandates are only called for by this AD, making them particularly thorny to implement, as this AD is the "lone wolf" in asking for them to be followed.
Click here to launch this Authority Document in the Common Controls Hub
This Authority Document has 22 citations mapped to 10 UCF Common Control IDs. The document as a whole was last reviewed and released on 2018-01-23.
Percent (%) of Citations with multiple mandates: 20%
Percent (%) of terms that were non-standard: 0.00% The number of non-standard terms doesn't affect UCF users as the UCF team have already mapped those terms to standard terms in the Compliance Dictionary.
Percent (%) of terms mapped into the AD's glossary: 0% Primary verbs and nouns not mapped into an AD's glossary can point to the AD's authors not paying attention to the definitions of their terms.
Percent (%) of terms where fewer than 5 other ADs referenced the term: 0% Any term in this category is not very widely used by the rest of the compliance community and therefore will more than likely need to be further investigated for any implications it might bring.
Percent (%) of mandates where only 1 to 5 other ADs mapped to the Common Control: 0% Mandates that aren't widely called for will take longer to implement than mandates that are more familiar.
Number of mandates where 0 other ADs mapped to the Common Control: 0% These mandates are only called for by this AD, making them particularly thorny to implement, as this AD is the "lone wolf" in asking for them to be followed.
Click here to launch this Authority Document in the Common Controls Hub
This Authority Document has 92 citations mapped to 48 UCF Common Control IDs. The document as a whole was last reviewed and released on 2018-02-02.
Percent (%) of Citations with multiple mandates: 22.4%
Percent (%) of terms that were non-standard: 0.00% The number of non-standard terms doesn't affect UCF users as the UCF team have already mapped those terms to standard terms in the Compliance Dictionary.
Percent (%) of terms mapped into the AD's glossary: 0% Primary verbs and nouns not mapped into an AD's glossary can point to the AD's authors not paying attention to the definitions of their terms.
Percent (%) of terms where fewer than 5 other ADs referenced the term: 12% Any term in this category is not very widely used by the rest of the compliance community and therefore will more than likely need to be further investigated for any implications it might bring.
Percent (%) of mandates where only 1 to 5 other ADs mapped to the Common Control: 0% Mandates that aren't widely called for will take longer to implement than mandates that are more familiar.
Number of mandates where 0 other ADs mapped to the Common Control: 9.8% These mandates are only called for by this AD, making them particularly thorny to implement, as this AD is the "lone wolf" in asking for them to be followed.
Click here to launch this Authority Document in the Common Controls Hub
This Authority Document has 51 citations mapped to 29 UCF Common Control IDs. The document as a whole was last reviewed and released on 2018-02-01.
Percent (%) of Citations with multiple mandates: 32.4%
Percent (%) of terms that were non-standard: 0.00% The number of non-standard terms doesn't affect UCF users as the UCF team have already mapped those terms to standard terms in the Compliance Dictionary.
Percent (%) of terms mapped into the AD's glossary: 0% Primary verbs and nouns not mapped into an AD's glossary can point to the AD's authors not paying attention to the definitions of their terms.
Percent (%) of terms where fewer than 5 other ADs referenced the term: 25.5% Any term in this category is not very widely used by the rest of the compliance community and therefore will more than likely need to be further investigated for any implications it might bring.
Percent (%) of mandates where only 1 to 5 other ADs mapped to the Common Control: 0% Mandates that aren't widely called for will take longer to implement than mandates that are more familiar.
Number of mandates where 0 other ADs mapped to the Common Control: 27.5% These mandates are only called for by this AD, making them particularly thorny to implement, as this AD is the "lone wolf" in asking for them to be followed.
Click here to launch this Authority Document in the Common Controls Hub
This Authority Document has 39 citations mapped to 16 UCF Common Control IDs. The document as a whole was last reviewed and released on 2018-02-01.
Percent (%) of Citations with multiple mandates: 12.9%
Percent (%) of terms that were non-standard: 0.00% The number of non-standard terms doesn't affect UCF users as the UCF team have already mapped those terms to standard terms in the Compliance Dictionary.
Percent (%) of terms mapped into the AD's glossary: 0% Primary verbs and nouns not mapped into an AD's glossary can point to the AD's authors not paying attention to the definitions of their terms.
Percent (%) of terms where fewer than 5 other ADs referenced the term: 5.1% Any term in this category is not very widely used by the rest of the compliance community and therefore will more than likely need to be further investigated for any implications it might bring.
Percent (%) of mandates where only 1 to 5 other ADs mapped to the Common Control: 0% Mandates that aren't widely called for will take longer to implement than mandates that are more familiar.
Number of mandates where 0 other ADs mapped to the Common Control: 5.1% These mandates are only called for by this AD, making them particularly thorny to implement, as this AD is the "lone wolf" in asking for them to be followed.
Click here to launch this Authority Document in the Common Controls Hub
This Authority Document has 39 citations mapped to 24 UCF Common Control IDs. The document as a whole was last reviewed and released on 2018-01-23.
Percent (%) of Citations with multiple mandates: 17.9%
Percent (%) of terms that were non-standard: 0.00% The number of non-standard terms doesn't affect UCF users as the UCF team have already mapped those terms to standard terms in the Compliance Dictionary.
Percent (%) of terms mapped into the AD's glossary: 0% Primary verbs and nouns not mapped into an AD's glossary can point to the AD's authors not paying attention to the definitions of their terms.
Percent (%) of terms where fewer than 5 other ADs referenced the term: 15.4% Any term in this category is not very widely used by the rest of the compliance community and therefore will more than likely need to be further investigated for any implications it might bring.
Percent (%) of mandates where only 1 to 5 other ADs mapped to the Common Control: 0% Mandates that aren't widely called for will take longer to implement than mandates that are more familiar.
Number of mandates where 0 other ADs mapped to the Common Control: 2.6% These mandates are only called for by this AD, making them particularly thorny to implement, as this AD is the "lone wolf" in asking for them to be followed.
Click here to launch this Authority Document in the Common Controls Hub
This Authority Document has 25 citations mapped to 11 UCF Common Control IDs. The document as a whole was last reviewed and released on 2018-01-23.
Percent (%) of Citations with multiple mandates: 15.8%
Percent (%) of terms that were non-standard: 0.00% The number of non-standard terms doesn't affect UCF users as the UCF team have already mapped those terms to standard terms in the Compliance Dictionary.
Percent (%) of terms mapped into the AD's glossary: 0% Primary verbs and nouns not mapped into an AD's glossary can point to the AD's authors not paying attention to the definitions of their terms.
Percent (%) of terms where fewer than 5 other ADs referenced the term: 0% Any term in this category is not very widely used by the rest of the compliance community and therefore will more than likely need to be further investigated for any implications it might bring.
Percent (%) of mandates where only 1 to 5 other ADs mapped to the Common Control: 0% Mandates that aren't widely called for will take longer to implement than mandates that are more familiar.
Number of mandates where 0 other ADs mapped to the Common Control: 0% These mandates are only called for by this AD, making them particularly thorny to implement, as this AD is the "lone wolf" in asking for them to be followed.
Click here to launch this Authority Document in the Common Controls Hub
This Authority Document has 24 citations mapped to 6 UCF Common Control IDs. The document as a whole was last reviewed and released on 2018-02-02.
Percent (%) of Citations with multiple mandates: 10%
Percent (%) of terms that were non-standard: 0.00% The number of non-standard terms doesn't affect UCF users as the UCF team have already mapped those terms to standard terms in the Compliance Dictionary.
Percent (%) of terms mapped into the AD's glossary: 0% Primary verbs and nouns not mapped into an AD's glossary can point to the AD's authors not paying attention to the definitions of their terms.
Percent (%) of terms where fewer than 5 other ADs referenced the term: 0% Any term in this category is not very widely used by the rest of the compliance community and therefore will more than likely need to be further investigated for any implications it might bring.
Percent (%) of mandates where only 1 to 5 other ADs mapped to the Common Control: 0% Mandates that aren't widely called for will take longer to implement than mandates that are more familiar.
Number of mandates where 0 other ADs mapped to the Common Control: 0% These mandates are only called for by this AD, making them particularly thorny to implement, as this AD is the "lone wolf" in asking for them to be followed.
Click here to launch this Authority Document in the Common Controls Hub
This Authority Document has 3 citations mapped to 1 UCF Common Control IDs. The document as a whole was last reviewed and released on 2018-02-08.
Percent (%) of Citations with multiple mandates: 0%
Percent (%) of terms that were non-standard: 0.00% The number of non-standard terms doesn't affect UCF users as the UCF team have already mapped those terms to standard terms in the Compliance Dictionary.
Percent (%) of terms mapped into the AD's glossary: 0% Primary verbs and nouns not mapped into an AD's glossary can point to the AD's authors not paying attention to the definitions of their terms.
Percent (%) of terms where fewer than 5 other ADs referenced the term: 0% Any term in this category is not very widely used by the rest of the compliance community and therefore will more than likely need to be further investigated for any implications it might bring.
Percent (%) of mandates where only 1 to 5 other ADs mapped to the Common Control: 0% Mandates that aren't widely called for will take longer to implement than mandates that are more familiar.
Number of mandates where 0 other ADs mapped to the Common Control: 0% These mandates are only called for by this AD, making them particularly thorny to implement, as this AD is the "lone wolf" in asking for them to be followed.
Click here to launch this Authority Document in the Common Controls Hub
This Authority Document has 50 citations mapped to 21 UCF Common Control IDs. The document as a whole was last reviewed and released on 2018-03-06.
Percent (%) of Citations with multiple mandates: 31%
Percent (%) of terms that were non-standard: 0.00% The number of non-standard terms doesn't affect UCF users as the UCF team have already mapped those terms to standard terms in the Compliance Dictionary.
Percent (%) of terms mapped into the AD's glossary: 0% Primary verbs and nouns not mapped into an AD's glossary can point to the AD's authors not paying attention to the definitions of their terms.
Percent (%) of terms where fewer than 5 other ADs referenced the term: 28% Any term in this category is not very widely used by the rest of the compliance community and therefore will more than likely need to be further investigated for any implications it might bring.
Percent (%) of mandates where only 1 to 5 other ADs mapped to the Common Control: 0% Mandates that aren't widely called for will take longer to implement than mandates that are more familiar.
Number of mandates where 0 other ADs mapped to the Common Control: 0% These mandates are only called for by this AD, making them particularly thorny to implement, as this AD is the "lone wolf" in asking for them to be followed.
Click here to launch this Authority Document in the Common Controls Hub
This Authority Document has 215 citations mapped to 124 UCF Common Control IDs. The document as a whole was last reviewed and released on 2018-03-07.
Percent (%) of Citations with multiple mandates: 44%
Percent (%) of terms that were non-standard: 0.00% The number of non-standard terms doesn't affect UCF users as the UCF team have already mapped those terms to standard terms in the Compliance Dictionary.
Percent (%) of terms mapped into the AD's glossary: 0% Primary verbs and nouns not mapped into an AD's glossary can point to the AD's authors not paying attention to the definitions of their terms.
Percent (%) of terms where fewer than 5 other ADs referenced the term: 20.5% Any term in this category is not very widely used by the rest of the compliance community and therefore will more than likely need to be further investigated for any implications it might bring.
Percent (%) of mandates where only 1 to 5 other ADs mapped to the Common Control: 0% Mandates that aren't widely called for will take longer to implement than mandates that are more familiar.
Number of mandates where 0 other ADs mapped to the Common Control: 6% These mandates are only called for by this AD, making them particularly thorny to implement, as this AD is the "lone wolf" in asking for them to be followed.
Click here to launch this Authority Document in the Common Controls Hub
This Authority Document has 13 citations mapped to 11 UCF Common Control IDs. The document as a whole was last reviewed and released on 2018-03-23.
Percent (%) of Citations with multiple mandates: 0%
Percent (%) of terms that were non-standard: 0.00% The number of non-standard terms doesn't affect UCF users as the UCF team have already mapped those terms to standard terms in the Compliance Dictionary.
Percent (%) of terms mapped into the AD's glossary: 0% Primary verbs and nouns not mapped into an AD's glossary can point to the AD's authors not paying attention to the definitions of their terms.
Percent (%) of terms where fewer than 5 other ADs referenced the term: 69.2% Any term in this category is not very widely used by the rest of the compliance community and therefore will more than likely need to be further investigated for any implications it might bring.
Percent (%) of mandates where only 1 to 5 other ADs mapped to the Common Control: 0% Mandates that aren't widely called for will take longer to implement than mandates that are more familiar.
Number of mandates where 0 other ADs mapped to the Common Control: 30.8% These mandates are only called for by this AD, making them particularly thorny to implement, as this AD is the "lone wolf" in asking for them to be followed.
Click here to launch this Authority Document in the Common Controls Hub
This Authority Document has 9 citations mapped to 8 UCF Common Control IDs. The document as a whole was last reviewed and released on 2018-03-23.
Percent (%) of Citations with multiple mandates: 12.5%
Percent (%) of terms that were non-standard: 0.00% The number of non-standard terms doesn't affect UCF users as the UCF team have already mapped those terms to standard terms in the Compliance Dictionary.
Percent (%) of terms mapped into the AD's glossary: 4.2% Primary verbs and nouns not mapped into an AD's glossary can point to the AD's authors not paying attention to the definitions of their terms.
Percent (%) of terms where fewer than 5 other ADs referenced the term: 44.4% Any term in this category is not very widely used by the rest of the compliance community and therefore will more than likely need to be further investigated for any implications it might bring.
Percent (%) of mandates where only 1 to 5 other ADs mapped to the Common Control: 0% Mandates that aren't widely called for will take longer to implement than mandates that are more familiar.
Number of mandates where 0 other ADs mapped to the Common Control: 55.6% These mandates are only called for by this AD, making them particularly thorny to implement, as this AD is the "lone wolf" in asking for them to be followed.
Click here to launch this Authority Document in the Common Controls Hub
This Authority Document has 150 citations mapped to 121 UCF Common Control IDs. The document as a whole was last reviewed and released on 2018-03-29.
Percent (%) of Citations with multiple mandates: 13.7%
Percent (%) of terms that were non-standard: 0.00% The number of non-standard terms doesn't affect UCF users as the UCF team have already mapped those terms to standard terms in the Compliance Dictionary.
Percent (%) of terms mapped into the AD's glossary: 0% Primary verbs and nouns not mapped into an AD's glossary can point to the AD's authors not paying attention to the definitions of their terms.
Percent (%) of terms where fewer than 5 other ADs referenced the term: 6% Any term in this category is not very widely used by the rest of the compliance community and therefore will more than likely need to be further investigated for any implications it might bring.
Percent (%) of mandates where only 1 to 5 other ADs mapped to the Common Control: 0% Mandates that aren't widely called for will take longer to implement than mandates that are more familiar.
Number of mandates where 0 other ADs mapped to the Common Control: 0% These mandates are only called for by this AD, making them particularly thorny to implement, as this AD is the "lone wolf" in asking for them to be followed.