OSCAL and CMMC: Exploring the Relationship - This article delves into the relationship between OSCAL (Open Security Controls Assessment Language) and CMMC (Cybersecurity Maturity Model Certification), examining how OSCAL is utilized within the context of CMMC and discussing the potential impact of OSCAL on streamlining compliance processes, improving security controls implementation, and enhancing assessment methodologies within the CMMC framework.
Open Security Controls Assessment Language (OSCAL) is a standardized, data-centric framework that provides machine-readable representations of control catalogs, control baselines, system security plans, and assessment plans and results. It aims to streamline and standardize the processes of documenting, implementing, and assessing security controls, transitioning the legacy approach to security plan generation and management to a data-centric approach, allowing for greater automation and verification. On the other hand, the Cybersecurity Maturity Model Certification (CMMC) is a program developed by the Department of Defense to protect sensitive unclassified information shared with contractors and subcontractors, featuring a tiered model, assessment requirements, and implementation through contracts. CMMC 2.0, an updated version, is designed to enhance cybersecurity, minimize costs for small businesses, and align with widely accepted standards.
The relationship between OSCAL and CMMC in the context of cybersecurity is significant due to the complementary roles they play in standardizing and enhancing security practices within organizations. OSCAL provides a standardized format to streamline and homogenize the processes of documenting, implementing, and assessing security controls within CMMC. This relationship between OSCAL and CMMC emphasizes the need for a cohesive and standardized approach to cybersecurity practices, particularly in organizations dealing with sensitive, unclassified information.
One specific example of the relationship between OSCAL and CMMC is the utilization of OSCAL's machine-readable representations of control catalogs and assessment plans within the framework of CMMC for enhancing the assessment and implementation of security controls. This integration streamlines the assessment process and ensures a standardized approach to security control documentation, which is crucial for organizations seeking CMMC certification.
OSCAL is utilized within the context of CMMC to provide a common means to identify and standardize assessment information, thereby streamlining and homogenizing the processes of documenting, implementing, and assessing security controls. By transitioning the legacy approach to security plan generation and management to a data-centric approach, OSCAL enables greater automation and verification within the CMMC framework.
To illustrate, OSCAL's machine-readable representations of control catalogs and assessment plans are utilized within the framework of CMMC, allowing for standardized and automated assessments of security controls. This utilization ensures that organizations seeking CMMC certification adhere to consistent and structured security control assessment practices, enhancing the overall cybersecurity posture.
Utilizing OSCAL within the CMMC framework also allows for the integration of machine-readable data with other security tools, enabling a more holistic and efficient approach to security control assessment. This integration ensures that organizations can leverage OSCAL's capabilities to enhance security practices within the context of CMMC, ultimately contributing to a more robust cybersecurity framework.
The potential impact of OSCAL on streamlining compliance processes within CMMC is significant, as it addresses challenges around security controls and security control assessment, such as lack of standardization and assessing control implementations across multiple components. OSCAL's utilization within CMMC aims to decrease paperwork, improve system security assessments, and enable continuous assessment.
OSCAL's extensible architecture, which expresses security controls in both machine and human-readable formats, allows for greater automation and verification. This automation streamlines compliance processes within CMMC, reducing the time and resources required for documenting and assessing security controls, ultimately leading to more efficient and effective compliance practices.
An example of the potential impact of OSCAL on streamlining compliance processes within CMMC is its role in automating the generation of System Security Plans and assessment activities. By automating these processes, OSCAL significantly reduces the administrative burden associated with compliance, allowing organizations to allocate resources more effectively to other critical areas of cybersecurity.
OSCAL contributes to improving security controls implementation within the context of CMMC by enabling the real-time automated assessment of security controls, which enhances security capabilities within the framework. Additionally, OSCAL's utilization within CMMC brings improved system security assessments, decreased assessment-related labor, and improved information sharing.
The Implementation Layer of OSCAL requires a Component Catalog to document controls, which can be created by the SCAP CCE and STIG communities. This integration ensures that security controls are implemented and documented in a standardized and consistent manner, contributing to the overall improvement of security controls implementation within the CMMC framework.
A specific example of OSCAL's contribution to improving security controls implementation in the context of CMMC is its role in enabling rapid and accurate creation of System Security Plans. This capability ensures that organizations can efficiently document and implement security controls, leading to a more robust and standardized approach to security controls implementation within the CMMC framework.
OSCAL enhances assessment methodologies within the CMMC framework by supporting the needs of different stakeholder groups and various use cases, ensuring consistency of data, providing ongoing, automated assessment, and integrating machine-readable data with other security tools. This enhancement leads to a more robust and standardized approach to security control assessment, ultimately contributing to the overall improvement of assessment methodologies within the CMMC framework.
One specific example of how OSCAL enhances assessment methodologies within the CMMC framework is its role in providing ongoing, automated assessment of security controls. This capability ensures that organizations can continuously monitor and assess their security controls, leading to a proactive and dynamic approach to cybersecurity within the CMMC framework.
Additionally, OSCAL's integration with other security tools allows for a more comprehensive and integrated assessment approach, ensuring that organizations can leverage a wide range of security capabilities to enhance their overall cybersecurity posture. This integration leads to a more holistic and effective assessment methodology within the CMMC framework, ultimately contributing to the overall improvement of security practices.
The significance of OSCAL in the domain of cybersecurity, particularly for organizations seeking CMMC certification, lies in its potential to standardize and streamline security practices, ultimately leading to a more robust and efficient cybersecurity framework. OSCAL's standardized format for documenting, implementing, and assessing security controls provides organizations with a structured and consistent approach to cybersecurity practices, ensuring they can meet the stringent requirements of CMMC certification.
An example of the significance of OSCAL in the domain of cybersecurity is its role in enabling organizations to transition from legacy approaches to security plan generation and management to a data-centric approach. This transition ensures that organizations seeking CMMC certification can leverage OSCAL's capabilities to enhance their security practices, ultimately leading to a more comprehensive and effective cybersecurity framework.
Additionally, OSCAL's potential to automate resource-intensive existing processes within the CMMC framework contributes to the overall significance of OSCAL in cybersecurity. This automation ensures that organizations seeking CMMC certification can optimize their resources and allocate them more effectively to critical areas of cybersecurity, ultimately leading to a more efficient and effective approach to security practices.
Recent developments in the convergence of OSCAL and CMMC include NIST's ongoing development of OSCAL as a standardized, data-centric framework for documenting and assessing security controls, aiming to reduce complexity and implementation costs. This development signifies a proactive approach to enhancing the interplay between OSCAL and CMMC, ensuring organizations can leverage the latest advancements to improve their cybersecurity practices.
The convergence of OSCAL and CMMC also raises questions about reciprocity and harmonization with other cybersecurity requirements. These questions indicate a growing awareness of the need for a cohesive and standardized approach to cybersecurity practices, ultimately leading to a more robust and efficient cybersecurity framework within the CMMC framework.
Industry discussions and webinars are ongoing, exploring the role of OSCAL in advancing supply chain risk management and making compliance assessment of cybersecurity standards more effective and efficient. These discussions reflect the industry's commitment to enhancing the interplay between OSCAL and CMMC, ensuring organizations can leverage the latest insights and perspectives to improve their cybersecurity practices.
Industry discussions emphasize the role of cybersecurity standards in advancing supply chain risk management and making compliance assessment of cybersecurity standards more effective and efficient through the adoption of OSCAL within the CMMC framework. These perspectives underscore the industry's recognition of the importance of a standardized and structured approach to cybersecurity practices, ultimately leading to a more robust and efficient cybersecurity framework within the CMMC framework.
An example of industry perspectives on OSCAL and CMMC is the ongoing discussion around the role of cybersecurity standards in advancing supply chain risk management. This discussion reflects the industry's recognition of the need for a cohesive and standardized approach to cybersecurity practices, ensuring that organizations can leverage the latest industry perspectives to enhance their security practices within the CMMC framework.
Anticipated future trends in the OSCAL framework and CMMC landscape include the industry's cross-platform commitment to developing, expressing, and auditing controls within the OSCAL framework. This commitment reflects the industry's recognition of the need for a cohesive and standardized approach to cybersecurity practices, ensuring that organizations can leverage the latest trends to improve their security practices within the CMMC framework.
Another anticipated future trend is the impact of OSCAL on assessment methodologies within the CMMC framework and its potential future trends. This trend signifies a proactive approach to enhancing the interplay between OSCAL and CMMC, ensuring organizations can leverage the latest advancements to improve their cybersecurity practices.
OSCAL's implementation through the rulemaking process allows for public comment periods for stakeholder input, indicating potential future trends in the OSCAL and CMMC landscape. This approach ensures organizations can provide input and feedback on the ongoing developments, ultimately leading to a more comprehensive and effective approach to cybersecurity practices within the CMMC framework.
Implementing OSCAL to streamline compliance processes and security controls is essential for organizations seeking to enhance their cybersecurity practices within the CMMC framework. OSCAL's capabilities in improving security capabilities, automating existing processes, and integrating machine-readable data with other security tools contribute to a more robust and standardized approach to compliance and security controls implementation.
Utilizing OSCAL within the CMMC framework brings benefits such as rapid and accurate creation of System Security Plans, automation of assessment activities, and expedited reviews of security authorization packages. This utilization ensures that organizations seeking CMMC certification can leverage OSCAL's capabilities to streamline compliance processes and security controls, ultimately leading to a more efficient and effective approach to cybersecurity practices.
Transitioning to OSCAL within CMMC aims to enhance the implementation of security controls and streamline compliance processes. This transition ensures that organizations can optimize their cybersecurity practices and align them with the stringent requirements of CMMC certification, ultimately leading to a more comprehensive and effective approach to security controls and compliance.
OSCAL is a framework it isn’t content. Beyond CMMC, what’s written in OSCAL today?
- Australian Cyber Security Centre's Information Security Manual: OSCAL-based security catalogs and profiles for the Australian Cyber Security Centre's Information Security Manual controls https://www.cyber.gov.au/ism/oscal.
- Center for Internet Security: the Center for Internet Security's Critical 18 Security controls as an OSCAL catalog, also with their controls related to other catalogs of security controls in the draft OSCAL mapping format https://github.com/CISecurity/CISControls_OSCAL.
- CivicAction's OSCAL-component-definitions: a public collection of OSCAL component definitions for commonly used cloud services, software, security controls, and privacy controls https://github.com/CivicActions/oscal-component-definitions.
- Cloud Security Alliance's Cloud Controls Matrix v4 Controls and Mappings: a bundle of the CCM Controls, CAIQ Security Questionnaire, Implementation Guidelines (both JSON/YAML and OSCAL) and Mappings (JSON/YAML) to support organizations that would like to foster CCM automation https://cloudsecurityalliance.org/artifacts/ccm-machine-readable-bundle-json-yaml-oscal.
- CMS Acceptable Risk Safeguards: the tailored profiles and catalog of adapted NIST SP 800-53 controls used by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services in OSCAL format. Perhaps the first OSCAL content released by a US government agency other than NIST, separate of collaboration with FedRAMP https://github.com/CMSgov/ars-machine-readable.
- CyberESI's CPRT OSCAL Catalog Library: a collection of official catalogs of various NIST frameworks in the CPRT format https://csrc.nist.gov/Projects/cprt/catalog#/cprt/home converted to OSCAL through a proprietary converter https://cyberesi-cg.com/oscal-cprt-catalog-project/.
- EasyDynamics oscal.io: a community site, like OSCAL Club, with examples of OSCAL content https://oscal.io/.
- Fathom5 SP 800-171 Catalog: the community-maintained version(s) of the NIST SP 800-171 catalog created by Fathom5 https://github.com/FATHOM5/oscal/tree/main/content/SP800-171/oscal-content.
- RedHat's OSCAL component definitions: a collection of OSCAL Component Definitions for testing with FedRAMP HIGH baseline profile https://github.com/RedHatProductSecurity/oscal-component-definitions.
- RedHat's OSCAL profiles: a collection of OSCAL custom profiles for testing with FedRAMP HIGH baseline profile https://github.com/RedHatProductSecurity/oscal-profiles.
As of early 2024, there is a growing integration of OSCAL within various Governance, Risk Management, and Compliance (GRC) and Security Operations (SecOps) tools.
Several tools and platforms are actively adopting OSCAL to enhance their capabilities. RegScale, a platform designed for security and compliance automation, is a notable early adopter and advocate of OSCAL. It has incorporated OSCAL into its framework, aiming to transition from traditional, manual compliance processes to a more automated, data-centric approach. RegScale’s platform includes support for developing OSCAL content across various domains like system security plans, assessment plans, and reports, offering tools for creating OSCAL content as part of their service offerings.
Another example is ScaleSec, a consulting firm specializing in cloud security and compliance, which acknowledges the significance of OSCAL in automating cloud policies and system security plans. ScaleSec is involved in developing tools that facilitate the integration of OSCAL with DevOps toolsets, thereby enhancing the testing of security controls and reporting adherence to them.
Continuum GRC, a cloud platform focusing on risk management and compliance support, also highlights the utility of OSCAL. While OSCAL is not a mandated standard by any cybersecurity framework, its structured and adaptable format is seen as beneficial for streamlining documentation, automating compliance processes, enhancing risk management, and preparing for future compliance needs. This highlights OSCAL's potential to improve efficiency and standardization in cybersecurity practices.
There’s even an OSCAL-based GRC tool called DRTConfidence built *specifically* to leverage OSCAL content, claiming itself to be the first GRC platform to successfully deliver a complete ATO package in OSCAL format to FedRAMP (GSA) and meet the necessary requirements.
Overall, the integration of OSCAL into GRC and SecOps tools is an evolving trend. These tools are leveraging OSCAL to automate and streamline their compliance and risk management processes, indicating a shift towards more data-driven and efficient security practices.